![]() The E cores on both chips are managed similarly by macOS: with a single low QoS thread, they’re run at low frequency (below 1 GHz), but when loaded with two or more threads, frequency is boosted to 2 GHz. Performance on the two chips was identical for integer, floating-point, NEON (vector processor) and Accelerate (Apple’s performance library, presumed here to use NEON too). The P cores were assessed with a workload of eight threads run at maximum Quality of Service (QoS), which fully loads all the P cores without any contribution from the E cores. These were tested separately using tight loops of assembly code in AsmAttic. My own app Mints for Neural Engine performance.īoth the M1 Pro and Max have the same general-purpose CPU cores: eight Performance (P) cores, and two Efficiency (E) cores.My own app Stibium for SSD performance,. ![]() My own app AsmAttic for in-core performance,.Mac Studio M1 Max, 24-core GPU, 32 GB memory, 2 TB SSD, costing £2599, to which you must add a keyboard, input device and display.MacBook Pro 16-inch M1 Pro, 16-core GPU, 32 GB memory, 2 TB SSD, costing £3,399. ![]() Now that I have a Studio (Max) sat behind my M1 Pro MacBook Pro, this article compares their benchmark results. A month ago, I explained what performance to expect in Apple’s new Mac Studio models.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |